PIX-INK: The Inkfluence Chronicles
Special Awareness Issue — The Power They Blame Us For
Central statement:
Women are being blamed for controlling systems they did not design, do not dominate and are still fighting to be heard within.
The phrase “White Liberal Women” appears in the comic as a hostile label used to flatten women into a stereotype—not as a description accepted by the narrator. The story should also make clear that women have different racial, cultural, political and economic experiences. Challenging this particular attack must not erase the distinct oppression experienced by Indigenous, Black and other racialized women.
Panel 1 — The accusation
A group of faceless social-media profiles surrounds a woman with repeated posts:
-
“Liberal women control everything!”
-
“Women ruined justice!”
-
“Women are changing the system!”
-
“Women get whatever they demand!”
The woman is shown carrying groceries, paying taxes, caring for family and trying to speak at a public meeting.
Caption:
“They speak as though women hold every lever of power.”
Her response:
“If I control the system, why must I fight so hard just to be heard by it?”
Panel 2 — Follow the actual power
J for Justice enters a vast institutional control room. The largest seats—government leadership, corporate boards, major industries, media ownership and senior decision-making—remain overwhelmingly occupied by powerful men.
Women appear throughout the machinery as workers, taxpayers, caregivers, advocates and service users, but few control the central switches.
J opens a file marked:
WHO DECIDES? WHO OWNS? WHO PROFITS? WHO IS HEARD?
Caption:
“Before blaming women for the system, examine who has historically designed, financed and led it.”
Panel 3 — Law is not personal female control
A woman working in justice or public service follows a large book titled THE LAW. An angry online crowd accuses her of creating every rule she applies.
Woman:
“Following a law is not the same as personally designing the system.”
J:
“Public servants, judges and officials work within legal structures. A woman’s presence does not mean the structure suddenly belongs to women.”
This panel distinguishes a woman holding a position from women collectively controlling the institution.
Panel 4 — The manufactured target
A media machine takes a complicated public disagreement and compresses it into one headline:
“WHITE LIBERAL WOMEN ARE THE PROBLEM.”
The headline is copied by anonymous accounts with blank faces, little posting history and no supporting evidence. Each repost becomes louder, while the original facts disappear beneath the repetition.
Caption:
“A repeated accusation can become socially powerful without becoming factually true.”
Pixi-Inkanna:
“Volume is not evidence. Repetition is not proof.”
The comic should call this an amplification pattern—not claim that every account belongs to one secret organization.
Panel 5 — The impossible contradiction
The page divides in two.
On one side, women are told:
-
“You have too much influence.”
-
“Stop interfering.”
-
“You are destroying the system.”
On the other side, women asking for safety, healthcare, housing, childcare, equal treatment and protection from violence are told:
-
“There is no funding.”
-
“That is not a priority.”
-
“Be patient.”
-
“Prove it happened.”
-
“Stop making everything about women.”
Across the centre:
“Women are accused of possessing enormous power whenever they challenge power—but treated as powerless when they ask that their needs be funded.”
Panel 6 — If women could direct their contribution
Women place their tax contributions into a transparent public budget. From it grow:
-
Women-led health services
-
Housing and family supports
-
Violence-prevention programs
-
Childcare and elder care
-
Accessible mental-health services
-
Human-rights advocacy
-
Environmental protection
-
Indigenous and community partnerships
-
Women-owned businesses and creative industries
Caption:
“Imagine if women had an equal, visible voice in deciding how the public resources they help create were used.”
This is presented as a political vision—not a claim that every woman would make identical decisions.
Panel 7 — Answer the conduct, not the hidden identity
IN-Vesta investigates the online attack using three evidence folders:
WHAT WE KNOW
-
Exact posts and messages
-
Dates and account names
-
Threats, impersonation or harassment
-
Platform responses
-
Repeated language and posting patterns
WHAT WE SUSPECT
-
Possible coordination
-
Political motivation
-
Connections between accounts
-
Financial or organizational influence
WHAT REQUIRES PROOF
-
Who operates an anonymous account
-
Whether accounts are centrally directed
-
Who paid for a campaign
-
The private motives of individual users
IN-Vesta:
“We can expose harassment without inventing evidence. Documentation protects our credibility—and our voice.”
Panel 8 — Reclaim the microphone
J, Pixi-Inkanna and IN-Vesta stand with a diverse coalition of women. The faceless profiles shrink as women document abuse, verify claims, report threats, protect one another and continue speaking.
Behind them is a public microphone labelled:
WOMEN’S LIVED EXPERIENCE IS EVIDENCE OF WHAT WOMEN EXPERIENCE
J speaks:
“You do not have to agree with my perspective. You do have to recognize my right to express it without harassment, threats or manufactured accusations.”
Final statement:
“Do not blame women for controlling a system that still resists sharing power with them.”
Footer:
LISTEN TO WOMEN • EXAMINE POWER • REQUIRE EVIDENCE • PROTECT FREE EXPRESSION
Inkfluence of Art — No One Left Behind
© Inkfluence of Art 2026
The Power We Are Accused of Having.